<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Damn I&#8217;m Thirsty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ducksblog.net/2007/02/15/damn-im-thirsty/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ducksblog.net/2007/02/15/damn-im-thirsty</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.ducksblog.net/2007/02/15/damn-im-thirsty#comment-1570</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducksblog.net/2007/02/15/damn-im-thirsty/#comment-1570</guid>
		<description>No one visits, so its hard to stay motivated you know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one visits, so its hard to stay motivated you know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl Sleek</title>
		<link>http://www.ducksblog.net/2007/02/15/damn-im-thirsty#comment-1568</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl Sleek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducksblog.net/2007/02/15/damn-im-thirsty/#comment-1568</guid>
		<description>Whoa, you're back at it again?  I had even dropped the link from BoC, but that should be restored shortly.

As for the papers, what are you going to do?  It has certainly been a perplexing set of games in February, which generally looked good until you realize 60 minutes are over and Anaheim still hadn't scored.  Hey, it's better than the alternative, I guess (no coverage).

Good to have ya back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, you&#8217;re back at it again?  I had even dropped the link from BoC, but that should be restored shortly.</p>
<p>As for the papers, what are you going to do?  It has certainly been a perplexing set of games in February, which generally looked good until you realize 60 minutes are over and Anaheim still hadn&#8217;t scored.  Hey, it&#8217;s better than the alternative, I guess (no coverage).</p>
<p>Good to have ya back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.187 seconds -->
